<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://montanaforests.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Montana Wilderness News</title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/news</link>
 <description>News Page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Tester says Forest Jobs and Recreation Act progressing</title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/tester_says_forest_jobs_and_recreation_act_progressing</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The first questioner at Sen. Jon Tester&#039;s Monday public forum in&lt;br /&gt;
Missoula wanted to know how the Forest Jobs and Recreation Act was&lt;br /&gt;
coming along.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;My wife and I just drove over through Lincoln, and there&#039;s&lt;br /&gt;
crystal-clear evidence we need to manage in a different way,&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Tester said of the beetle-killed acres of forest. &amp;quot;We need to give&lt;br /&gt;
the Forest Service some different tools to work with.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/tester_says_forest_jobs_and_recreation_act_progressing&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://montanaforests.org/category/general_category/forest_bill">Forest Bill</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:13:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">142 at http://montanaforests.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sally Mauk: For new wilderness to succeed, next generation must have interest</title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/news/op-ed_pieces/sally_mauk%3A_new_wilderness_succeed%2C_next_generation_must_have_interest</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://missoulian.com/content/tncms/live/global/resources/images/print_logo.gif&quot; alt=&quot;missoulian.com&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Sally Mauk: For new wilderness to succeed, next generation must have interest&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;By SALLY MAUK&lt;br /&gt;
for the Missoulian |  Posted: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:30 pm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In another life, I was a wilderness ranger, and to this day&lt;br /&gt;
there&#039;s a certain trail in a certain wilderness where I am most at&lt;br /&gt;
peace with myself and with the world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://montanaforests.org/news/op-ed_pieces/sally_mauk%3A_new_wilderness_succeed%2C_next_generation_must_have_interest&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://montanaforests.org/category/general_category/news/op-ed_pieces">Op-Ed Pieces</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:49:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">141 at http://montanaforests.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Working locally, working together</title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/working_locally%2C_working_together</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Although the conservation challenges facing others across&lt;br /&gt;
Montana vary, the fact remains that grassroots efforts have sprung&lt;br /&gt;
up where folks have chosen to set aside their differences and work&lt;br /&gt;
together. They say all politics is local and that&#039;s certainly the&lt;br /&gt;
level where the Forest Jobs and Recreation Act originated. The&lt;br /&gt;
compromises and agreements forged by the many folks involved were&lt;br /&gt;
done so in an open fashion, through years of hard work, lengthy&lt;br /&gt;
debate, and input from many different types of people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/working_locally%2C_working_together&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://montanaforests.org/category/general_category/forest_bill">Forest Bill</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:59:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">140 at http://montanaforests.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tester: Forest Jobs bill can help reduce fire danger, create jobs</title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/tester%3A_forest_jobs_bill_can_help_reduce_fire_danger%2C_create_jobs</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sen. Jon Tester reported progress on his Forest&lt;br /&gt;
Jobs and Recreation bill, affirmed support for Secure Rural Schools,&lt;br /&gt;
and again tried to quash the rumor about a federal land lockup in&lt;br /&gt;
Montana. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He made the remarks during his monthly teleconference with Montana newspaper reporters on Thursday morning. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/tester%3A_forest_jobs_bill_can_help_reduce_fire_danger%2C_create_jobs&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://montanaforests.org/category/general_category/forest_bill">Forest Bill</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:09:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">139 at http://montanaforests.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Forest Jobs and Recreation Act: Tester has kept openness promise</title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/news/letters_editor/forest_jobs_and_recreation_act%3A_tester_has_kept_openness_promise</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have been following Sen. Jon Tester and his proposed changes to the Forest Jobs and Recreation Act; this bill has some things in it I really like and some things I disagree with, but the truth is he&#039;s showing it for Montanans to see as it moves through Washington, D.C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That was Tester&#039;s promise when we elected him and he&#039;s keeping that promise. &amp;quot;Tester said in a conference call with reporters, ‘It&#039;s going to streamline the process to make it work better, faster and more flexible.&#039; &amp;quot; (Missoulian, June 18).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://montanaforests.org/news/letters_editor/forest_jobs_and_recreation_act%3A_tester_has_kept_openness_promise&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://montanaforests.org/category/general_category/news/letters_editor">Letters to the Editor</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:25:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">138 at http://montanaforests.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tester proposes changes to Montana wilderness, logging bill</title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/news/tester_proposes_changes_montana_wilderness%2C_logging_bill</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A borrowed bit from an otherwise dead-on-arrival discussion&lt;br /&gt;
draft could make Montana Sen. Jon Tester&#039;s Forest Jobs and&lt;br /&gt;
Recreation Act work better, the senator said on Thursday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This is more like the sports car avenue, to identify projects&lt;br /&gt;
and get those done that are not controversial,&amp;quot; Tester said in a&lt;br /&gt;
conference call with reporters. &amp;quot;It&#039;s going to streamline the&lt;br /&gt;
process to make it more work better, faster and more flexible.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://montanaforests.org/news/tester_proposes_changes_montana_wilderness%2C_logging_bill&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://montanaforests.org/category/general_category/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:03:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">137 at http://montanaforests.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Chronicle editorial: Forest bill a fragile compromise worth saving </title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/news/op-ed_pieces/chronicle_editorial%3A_forest_bill_fragile_compromise_worth_saving</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A deal&#039;s a deal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s the message Montana Sen. Jon Tester has for the U.S. Senate&lt;br /&gt;
Energy and Natural Resources Committee. And, in reality, he has&lt;br /&gt;
little choice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tester&#039;s forest bill came out of a delicate compromise among&lt;br /&gt;
diverse forest user groups. It would create some 600,000 acres of&lt;br /&gt;
wilderness - mostly here in Southwest Montana. But it would also&lt;br /&gt;
set aside areas for motorized recreation and require the logging of&lt;br /&gt;
10,000 acres of forest in each of the next 10 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://montanaforests.org/news/op-ed_pieces/chronicle_editorial%3A_forest_bill_fragile_compromise_worth_saving&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://montanaforests.org/category/general_category/news/op-ed_pieces">Op-Ed Pieces</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:01:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">136 at http://montanaforests.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tester calls forest bill changes &#039;dead on arrival&#039;</title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/tester_calls_forest_bill_changes_%2526%2523039%3Bdead_arrival%2526%2523039%3B</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;HELENA, Mont. (AP) - U.S. Sen. Jon Tester has dismissed a proposed rewrite of his forest bill as &amp;quot;dead on arrival,&amp;quot; and promised to publicly post his counteroffer that is expected next week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tester&#039;s bill would create new wilderness in parts of Montana, while increasing logging requirements and establishing permanent recreation areas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Senate Committee recently came up with its own version that does away with the logging and other mandates that are central to a deal crafted by a group of Montana loggers, environmentalists and others.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/tester_calls_forest_bill_changes_%2526%2523039%3Bdead_arrival%2526%2523039%3B&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://montanaforests.org/category/general_category/forest_bill">Forest Bill</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:20:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">135 at http://montanaforests.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Coalition proposes forest restoration in Blackfoot, Clearwater, Swan river valleys</title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/blackfoot_clearwater_stewardship_project/coalition_proposes_forest_restoration_blackfoot</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;KALISPELL - Heal the forest, clear the stream, kill the weeds&lt;br /&gt;
and build the trails. Pay the logger, help the wildlife, fight the&lt;br /&gt;
fire, save the mill.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;That&#039;s the way forward, is to look at our forests and our&lt;br /&gt;
communities at the landscape level,&amp;quot; said Scott Brennan. &amp;quot;That&#039;s&lt;br /&gt;
the only way out of gridlock.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/blackfoot_clearwater_stewardship_project/coalition_proposes_forest_restoration_blackfoot&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://montanaforests.org/category/general_category/forest_bill/blackfoot_clearwater_stewardship_project">Blackfoot Clearwater Stewardship Project</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:33:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">133 at http://montanaforests.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UM forestry professor aims to put Tester bill into bigger context</title>
 <link>http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/um_forestry_professor_aims_put_tester_bill_bigger_context</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;I do not like to forest plan. I do not like it, Stan the&lt;br /&gt;
man!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Would you, with a Forest hat, write and write on&lt;br /&gt;
habitat?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Or wax poetic what you see, for species viability?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;I will not work on habitat, for potato bean or Indiana&lt;br /&gt;
bat!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;I will not write them, don&#039;t you see? I don&#039;t like&lt;br /&gt;
viability!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;- Phil Sammon, with apologies to Dr. Seuss, posted in&lt;br /&gt;
the New Century of Forest Planning humor section&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://montanaforests.org/forest_bill/um_forestry_professor_aims_put_tester_bill_bigger_context&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://montanaforests.org/category/general_category/forest_bill">Forest Bill</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:36:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">134 at http://montanaforests.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
